The Leica SL Review: Love or Hate, or Both?
Leica SL with 35mm f/1.4 Summilux
I love the new Leica SL. Ok, I didn’t have to actually buy it by selling my car and half my belongings to get it, so my opinion is slightly skewed. However as a camera reviewer I am obligated to to try my best to give an unbiased opinion based on my user experience as well as an understanding the current market place and where it is going. First of all the market is going mirrorless. Brands like Nikon and Canon who laughed at the idea that the future was mirrorless are now clamouring to enter the mirrorless market for the mid-level photographer. The market is also going higher end since the smartphone camera has decimated the sub $500 point and shoot market (except for waterproof and action cameras). The Leica SL is definitely mirrorless and it is premium. It’s built like a tank, it has the highest resolving electronic viewfinder, it’s weather-sealed, it’s autofocus (unlike the Leica M system), and it’s full-frame. This camera should be loved by everyone, but it’s not. At $7450 USD body only (as of February 2016), many are up in arms about the SL. I’ve gotten more hate comments on my Instagram and YouTube comment section for reviewing this camera than any other camera I’ve reviewed in the past 4 years. Does this camera deserve the angst that it’s receiving from many? Let’s find out.
Leica SL with 35mm f/1.4 Summilux
As an image making tool, the Leica SL does not disappoint. It uses a similar but slightly improved full frame (36mmx 24mm) sensor and processor from the Leica Q at 24 mega-pixels. It is more sensitive with ISO 50 as the minimum setting (maximum ISO 50,000), great for those who wish to shoot at maximum resolution and details with the least amount of noise. I found a bit of trouble in the shadow areas at low ISO (like the Leica Q) so I recommend to shoot between ISO 400-800 when dealing with a wide exposure image. The SL can also shoot a maximum of 33 RAW files at 11fps bursts, or unlimited JPEGs due to the large 2GB internal buffer.
This camera also has full sized HDMI and USB 3.0 output connectors built in, great for those who wish to either save or view with an external monitor and/or computer. Think of a studio or location photographer who needs to display or view instant results. This goes the same for using this to capture video. The SL can do full 4K video at 30 and 24fps (4:2:0 8 bit sampling internal or external 4:2:2 10 bit sampling output via full size HDMI connector). Even at full HD mode progressive (1920 x 1080) the new Leica can shoot a maximum 120 fps, great for slow motion capture.
Leica SL with 28mm f/2 Summicron
So far so good right? Not so fast. Although the SL is an autofocus mirrorless camera, currently there is only a single lens available, the Vario-Elmarit 24mm-90mm f/2.8-4 lens. At 1140g (2.51 lbs) and a 82mm front filter thread, this lens is nothing like the M-mount lenses we have come to associate with the Leica brand. Although the image quality is first class and the autofocus is very quick and accurate, this lens is too big and unsightly to be practical for many photographers. I can see event, studio and wedding photographers using this type of lens, but many Leica photographers are street photographers at heart. If any lens will succeed with the SL, it will be the 50mm f/1.4 Summilux, available at the end of 2016. That’s a long time to wait to shoot a mirrorless Leica with an AF prime lens. The solution? Since the Leica SL and T share the same mount, you can use the 4 currently available T mount lenses, although these lenses will only produce 10mp images due to the cropping of the native 24mp sensor. What I found more practical was to use the existing M-Adapter T (for the Leica T system) and use M mount lenses on the Leica SL. Does this make any sense? I think it makes a lot of sense.
The Leica SL is primarily targeting existing Leica customers, the majority of them with M bodies and M mount lenses. Until the SL system has more lenses available (especially primes), the new SL owner will want more lens choice besides the 24-90mm zoom. It’s a great lens but not practical in many situations and I can see some SL owners forgoing this lens. My guess is many Leica owners will still prefer the compact manual focus lenses of the M-mount system, and extreme focal length lenses (21mm wide or 135mm tele) will actually work really nice with the SL’s brilliant EVF. I found I shot more often with my Minolta M-Rokkor 90mm f/4 on the SL due to the ease in which I can frame and focus with the viewfinder.
Leica SL with 24mm-90mm f/2.8-4 Vario-Elmarit
After having the Leica SL for a few weeks shooting it in a variety of situations and with a variety of lenses, my overall impression is this camera is the beginning of a strong category for Leica. Let’s go over quickly the pros and cons of this new camera. Let’s start with the pros:
solid professional build quality with high level weather-sealing. The sturdiest mirrorless camera currently available on the market
highest available electronic viewfinder (4.4 million pixels) with high refresh rate
quick and accurate autofocus system with very functional manual focus features
simple Leica operating system with logical placement and customizable buttons
highest quality Leica digital images with a full-frame (36mmx 24mm) sensor with low ISO 50 sensitivity
the most compatible Leica camera to-date with multiple (upcoming) lens adapters
very expensive (although reasonable within the Leica eco-system)
very heavy and large, especially for a mirrorless camera
very large lenses with average aperture speed for its size and weight
very strong competition (especially from the Sony A7 series)
Leica SL with the 35mm Summilux